The irony of the religious cult of Climate Change, and the fund raising of the Evangelist in the Oval Office, is this..... While Obama is collecting the tithes and offerings of the world in the name of stopping Climate Change, Global Cooling is descending on the world.
Every 400 years the world goes through a cooling era of about 70 years. This does not happen suddenly, so farmers keep trying to raise the usual grain crops, and year by year the failure rate increases until there is famine.
So, due to the demonic religion of Climate Change, no one in high places to facing the right direction as our future. But, there are many scientists around the world studying this, and they are finding many markers of the Maunder Minimum.
The most terrifying marker of GC is the nearly total disappearance of sun spots of any intensity. Coronal holes develop on the east limb of the sun, and as they turn on toward us they go dead. You can see them blowing off horrific flares as they come around, they then go dead as they face earth, and then they often blow off again as they move on around the west limb of the sun.
This means that, whatever the forces of the Maunder Minimum are, they are in full force and stopping almost all flaring which is needed to keep the ideal balance of earth climate. This means we are in a Maunder Minimum, and the only way we will survive as we move forward is for the farmers in Kansas and Nebraska to plant cabbage and turnips, and YOU, Bunky, will have to learn to eat them or starve.
It is NOT an Ice Age. It is a climate slump in temperature for about 70 years, and it comes around like clockwork. We have a splendid history is a MM from the 1600s in Europe. But, you have heard almost nothing about this, right?
This graphic shows the Maunder Minimum is a very real thing, not a modern political religion.
The following is an article by S. Fred Singer of the U. of Virginia. This man has a massive pedigree behind him, and he is telling the truth. He does not use the actual words "Maunder Minimum," for those words would cause the elite to scream blasphemy. But, what he describes is precisely what the climate conditions are during a Maunder Minimum. He uses instead the term Little Ice Age, which is exactly the same thing.
Every 400 years the world goes through a cooling era of about 70 years. This does not happen suddenly, so farmers keep trying to raise the usual grain crops, and year by year the failure rate increases until there is famine.
So, due to the demonic religion of Climate Change, no one in high places to facing the right direction as our future. But, there are many scientists around the world studying this, and they are finding many markers of the Maunder Minimum.
The most terrifying marker of GC is the nearly total disappearance of sun spots of any intensity. Coronal holes develop on the east limb of the sun, and as they turn on toward us they go dead. You can see them blowing off horrific flares as they come around, they then go dead as they face earth, and then they often blow off again as they move on around the west limb of the sun.
This means that, whatever the forces of the Maunder Minimum are, they are in full force and stopping almost all flaring which is needed to keep the ideal balance of earth climate. This means we are in a Maunder Minimum, and the only way we will survive as we move forward is for the farmers in Kansas and Nebraska to plant cabbage and turnips, and YOU, Bunky, will have to learn to eat them or starve.
It is NOT an Ice Age. It is a climate slump in temperature for about 70 years, and it comes around like clockwork. We have a splendid history is a MM from the 1600s in Europe. But, you have heard almost nothing about this, right?
This graphic shows the Maunder Minimum is a very real thing, not a modern political religion.
BUT FIRST, HERE IS RESEARCH SOURCING FOR YOU:
GREG CLEMENTS- A TUTORIAL ON THE SUN AND MAUNDER MINIMUM
I plan to record short video tutorials for introductory physics and introductory astronomy on this channel. I taught physics and astronomy courses at Dickinson College in Carlisle, PA from 1978 to 1982. I have been teaching introductory physics, astronomy, math, and computer science at Midland University in Fremont, Nebraska since 1983.You really should watch the whole presentation in order to see the science of the sun in relation to the Maunder Minimum which is the last topic.
I plan to record short video tutorials for introductory physics and introductory astronomy on this channel. I taught physics and astronomy courses at Dickinson College in Carlisle, PA from 1978 to 1982. I have been teaching introductory physics, astronomy, math, and computer science at Midland University in Fremont, Nebraska since 1983.You really should watch the whole presentation in order to see the science of the sun in relation to the Maunder Minimum which is the last topic.
SHORTER TUTORIAL WITH MORE EMPHASIS ON THE MAUNDER MINIMUM
This is the first study I have seen that talks about UV missing during a MM and the mold and blight damage to crops. Instead of developing GMOs, Monstanto should be developing cold and mold resistant seeds. His discussion of green houses. Out US leaders will die screaming, "Climate Change" instead of developing green house agriculture. The video author's YouTube site in which he gives real survival solutions for the ongoing Global Cooling Mini Ice Age.
SO WHY DOES "CLIMATE CHANGE" WIN AND THE MAUNDER MINIMUM LITTLE ICE AGE LOSE?
Answer:
This is the first study I have seen that talks about UV missing during a MM and the mold and blight damage to crops. Instead of developing GMOs, Monstanto should be developing cold and mold resistant seeds. His discussion of green houses. Out US leaders will die screaming, "Climate Change" instead of developing green house agriculture. The video author's YouTube site in which he gives real survival solutions for the ongoing Global Cooling Mini Ice Age.
You will learn again of solutions for you in your area.
______________________________________
FINALLY, THE ARTICLE
FROM THE AMERICAN THINKER
By: S. Fred Singer is professor emeritus at the University of Virginia
FROM THE AMERICAN THINKER
By: S. Fred Singer is professor emeritus at the University of Virginia
January 29, 2016
Climate Change: The Burden of Proof
By S. Fred Singer
This article is based on a Heartland Panel talk [Dec7, 2015, at Hotel California, Paris].
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has to provide proof for significant humancaused climate change; yet
their climate models have never been validated and are rapidly diverging from actual observations. The real threat to humanity
comes not from any (trivial) greenhouse warming but from cooling periods creating food shortages and famines.
Burden of proof
Climate change has been going on for millions of years long before humans existed on this planet. Obviously, the causes were
all of natural origin and not anthropogenic. There is no reason to think that these natural causes have suddenly stopped. For
example, volcanic eruptions, various types of solar influences, and atmosphereocean oscillations all continue today. We cannot
model these natural climateforcings precisely and therefore cannot anticipate what they will be in the future.
But let’s call this the “Null hypothesis.” Logically therefore, the burden of proof falls upon alarmists to demonstrate that this null
hypothesis is not adequate to account for empirical climate data. In other words, alarmists must provide convincing observational
evidence for anthropogenic climate change (ACC). They must do this by detailed comparison of the data with climate models.
This is of course extremely difficult and virtually impossible since one cannot specify these natural influences precisely.
We’re not aware of such detailed comparisons, only of anecdotal evidence although we must admit that ACC is plausible; after
all, CO2 is a greenhouse gas and its level has been rising mainly because of the burning of fossil fuels.
Yet when we compare greenhouse models to past observations (“hindcasting”), it appears that ACC is much smaller than predicted
by the models. There’s even a time interval of no significant warming (“pause” or “hiatus”) during the past 18 years or so in
spite of rapidly rising atmospheric CO2 levels.
There seems to be at present no generally accepted explanation for this discrepancy between models and observations, mainly
during the 21 century. The five IPCC reports [1900 to 2014] insist that there is no “gap.” Yet strangely, as this gap grows larger
and larger, their claimed certainty that there is no gap becomes ever greater. Successive IPCC reports give 50%, 66%, 90%, 95%,
and 99% for this certainty.
http://admin.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-01/195958_5_.jpg
Needless to say, there are no suf icient conditions to establish the existence of any significant ACC from existing data. Even
necessary conditions based on empirical data, like temperature vs altitude and latitude, cloud cover, precipitation, are difficult to
establish.
To summarize, any major disagreement of data with models therefore disproves ACC.
IPCC’s models are not validated and therefore not policyrelevant
In other words,
GH models have not been validated and may never be validated and therefore are not policyrelevant.
Anyway, any warming observed during the past century appears to be trivially small and most likely economically beneficial
overall. Careful studies by leading economists and agricultural experts have established these facts [see for example NIPCCClimateChangeReconsideredII
– 2014].
http://admin.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2016-01/195957_5_.png
I therefore regard the absence of any significant GH warming as settled; note my emphasis on the word “significant.” Policies to
limit CO2 emissions are wasting resources that could better be used for genuine societal problems like public health. They are also
counterproductive since CO2 promotes plant growth and crop yields, as shown by dozens of agricultural publications.
Surviving a coming climate cooling
I am much more concerned by a cooling climate as predicted by many climate scientists with its adverse effects on ecology and
severe consequences for humanity.
Singer and Avery in “Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 years” have described one form of observed cyclical climate
change. It was first seen during the past glaciation. Loehle and Singer claim evidence for these cycles to extend into the present.
In particular, historical records identify the recent cycle of a (beneficial) Medieval Warm Period (MWP) and the (destructive) Little
Ice Age (LIA) with its failed harvests, starvation, disease, and mass deaths. Many solar experts predict another LIA cooling within
decades.
I have therefore explored ways to counter the (imminent) next cooling phase through lowcost and low ecologicalrisk geoengineering,
using a specific greenhouse effect – not based on CO2.
At the same time, assuming that our scheme does not work perfectly, we need to prepare for adaptation to a colder climate, with
special attention to supply of food and sustainable water and energy.
The outlook for such adaptation appears promising – provided there is adequate preparation. However, the coming cold period will
test the survivability of our technological civilization.
I dedicate this essay to the memory of Prof “Bob” Carter, my fellowpanelist, NIPCC coauthor, and travel companion in Western
and Eastern Europe, China, and all around the USA. "He died with his boots on."
S. Fred Singer is professor emeritus at the University of Virginia and a founding director of the Science & Environmental
Policy Project; in 2014, after 25 years, he stepped down as president of SEPP. His specialty is atmospheric and space physics.
An expert in remote sensing and satellites, he served as the founding director of the US Weather Satellite Service and, more
recently, as vice chair of the US National Advisory Committee on Oceans & Atmosphere. He is an elected Fellow of several
scientific societies and a Senior Fellow of the Heartland Institute and the Independent Institute. He coauthored the NY Times
bestseller Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 years. In 2007, he founded and has chaired the NIPCC
(Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change), which has released several scientific reports [See
NIPCCreport.org]. For recent writings see http://www.americanthinker.com/s_fred_singer/ and also Google Scholar.
Answer:
1. Big Government and the world elite need crises which are not real, cost them no effort or money, and will rally the masses to actually beg to be herded and rescued.
2. There is no solution for the real issue, the Maunder Minimum, without total change in the priorities of world governments. War will have to be put off, and all effort will need to go into developing agriculture nearer the sub-tropics and the equator.
3. The Maunder Minimum will not make a hero of any world leader who helps get ready for it. It comes on slowly, year by year, so that during one term in office a leader would not be able to prove he did the right thing to start getting ready. Like Climate Change, people would not believe it was for real, and the end result could even be for a leader to be mocked and leave office in disgrace.
You see, the White Race rules the world. It is impossible for the White Race leaders to humble themselves and go to the equatorial nations and beg them for help. China is now taking Africa away from Europe by actually doing good works as they take home resources. The USA's plan has been to simply rape Africa. They are not in a mood to feed us now.
Thus, we the people are on our own.
I would suggest you build a green house NOW, and learn to use it. I have one, and it is a lot of fun, but it is also a lot of work. Also, there are supplies you will need that will be gone once the crisis really hits.
START BUYING AND PLANTING HEIRLOOM SEED NOW. Once the Maunder Minimum really hits hard, the government will direct all seed to farms which are under government control, and most of that food will go to the US Military and people our leaders want to bribe. With heirloom seed, you can save seed from one year for the next and know you will get the same thing.
There is also the option of moving to a warmer climate. This would the the Gulf states in the USA, and it would be the Mediterranean for European people. But, the move must be made long before the winters become really fierce because the destination nations will at some point close their border. There are also the equatorial nations, but most of them involve living with extreme government corruption. I would suggest that the ideal place to live for Americans and Europeans would be Greenland, Australia.
Remember, what you do now to get ready will probably not make your personal life a lot different, but it may determine whether or not your kids and grand kids starve or become beggars. This thing is said to last anywhere from 50 to 200 years. Russian scientists say 200. I am convinced that Vladimir Putin is getting Russia ready for this because of his attempts to take over warm climate areas like southern Ukraine and parts of the Middle East. The USA has cut itself out of the picture by making the whole Middle East enraged by our urge to create chaos.
This is not a conspiracy, and it is not a panic situation. But, it also WILL come down upon the world, and those who put off getting adapted and ready will suffer the most. If you are a farmer, consider what you could grow that would take a colder winter. Farmers who adapt up front will rule the world.
